Gary Anderson's article highlights a critical issue in Formula 1's future direction: the introduction of a 'customer engine' alongside the existing manufacturer power unit formula. Anderson argues that this idea, while seemingly logical, raises numerous complex questions and is ultimately doomed to fail.
Anderson begins by expressing skepticism towards the customer engine concept, citing past experiences where similar initiatives failed. He emphasizes the importance of careful consideration before making rash decisions, especially in light of recent public statements from FIA president Mohammed Ben Sulayem. Anderson's personal perspective is clear: he believes that the customer engine idea is a step backward.
One of the main concerns Anderson raises is the potential for manufacturer influence and control over the customer engine. He argues that if the FIA allows independent companies to build and supply engines at a reduced price, it will create a divide between 'haves and have-nots' among teams. Anderson suggests that manufacturers might pressure the customer engine to be inferior, undermining the attempts to level the playing field through measures like the cost cap and fairer Concorde Agreement payments.
Anderson also criticizes the FIA's handling of power unit regulations, arguing that the current issues with hybrid systems and power units are largely the result of the governing body's decisions. He believes that the introduction of a customer engine would further complicate matters and potentially exacerbate existing problems.
In his analysis, Anderson proposes a different approach. He suggests that the FIA and Liberty Media should collaborate with power unit manufacturers and high-end independent engine manufacturers to develop a more flexible power unit concept. Anderson envisions a maximum customer price for the season's supply of the unit, allowing independent manufacturers to compete if they can secure customers. He also recommends limiting the number of teams each engine manufacturer can supply to ensure a more balanced distribution.
Anderson's solution involves keeping the hybrid system but restricting its usage to overtaking aids. He suggests that the system should only be activated if a driver is within one second of the car in front when crossing the start/finish line, providing a more realistic and least artificial overtaking scenario. Anderson concludes by acknowledging the value of different suggestions but expresses frustration with the FIA's resistance to change.
In summary, Gary Anderson's article provides a critical and insightful analysis of the customer engine idea in Formula 1. His personal perspective and commentary offer a fresh perspective on a complex issue, highlighting the potential pitfalls and suggesting alternative solutions.
